Redesigned Outlander cruises beyond costlier SUVs
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. — There are so many new compact crossover SUVs bursting onto the automotive scene that it would be easy to overlook a few of them. Overlooking the 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander, however, would be a serious mistake for any consumer interested in a combination of good looks, advanced technology, attention to detail, fun-to-drive quotient, and a bargain sticker price.
Completely redone, the new Outlander has a tall challenge, trying to compete against the suddenly-expanding compact/crossover SUV segment against such stalwarts as the Toyota RAV4, Honda CR-V, Hyundai Santa Fe and Tucson, Kia Sportage, Ford Escape, Saturn Vue, Chevy Equinox, and flashy newcomers such as the Acura RD-X, or Mazda CX-7.
But the Outlander has blended features that can individual beat some of the best of those competitors, and it may, in fact, do a better job than any of them of offering all the right stuff. Its proficiency is something of a surprise, too, because Mitsubishi has just done away with the Montero, following the Montero Sport to the SUV sidelines. The company seemed to have lost its way a bit in recent years, even though it stuck with the small, 2.0-liter turbo to make the Evolution fly, but it went to a large, 3.8-liter V6 in the new Eclipse, veering away from its strength – small engines that over-achieve.
Mitsubishi has been impressive in its technical advances for nearly four decades, if not always under its own name. The Dodge Colt had a 1600 cc. overhead-cam four-cylinder with a third valve, called the MCA Jet, to create a swirling, better-igniting dash to the fuel-air mixture. That was a Mitsubishi engine, and it became instantly the smoothest 4 on the market a couple years later, when Mitsubishi ingeniously put counter-balance “Silent Shafts†inside the block to eliminate harmonic vibration. That was in 1971, I believe. Also, think of all those Dodge Caravans that cruised effortlessly for 200,000 miles with their 3.0-liter V6 engines. Those also were Mitsubishi engines.
But it will take something special to make it in this era of the fastest-growing marketplace segment, and the Outlander just could be that special. Consider the assets:
• Great looks, an all-new platform with a longer, wider, taller body, and wheelbase lengthened by 2 inches. That makes it 182.7 inches long, within two inches of the Santa Fe and CX-7, and longer than the RAV4, CR-V, RDX, Vue, and Compass. Some have written that it’s on the Lancer Evolution platform, but the fact is, it is a new “C†platform that will be assimilated into the next new models of the Lancer and Evolution. Use of high-strength steel in the lower body, and such top-lightening steps as an aluminum roof lower the center of gravity, improve the feeling of stability, while increasing torsional rigidity 18 percent and flexing rigidity by 39 percent over the outgoing Outlander.
• Excellent power, with an all-new 3.0-liter V6 (longer stroke, smaller bore than the old tried and true 3.0) with 220 horsepower, 204 foot-pounds of torque, a MIVEC (Mitsubishi Innovative Valve-timing and lift Electronic Control) upgrade that works with a two-stage variable intake manifold, and some clever placement of catalytic converters to become the first V6 in its class to achieve PZEV (Partial Zero Emission Vehicle) stature.
• A high fun-to-drive level, thanks to superbly bolstered bucket seats and a 6-speed automatic transmission with sequential manual capabilities that offer tall, vertical paddles made of magnesium on either side of the steering-wheel column. By being tall, they are easy to operate – right side for upshifts, left for downshifts – and by being fixed, they are always easy to locate, even if you need an immediate shift while in the middle of a sharp turn. A neat feature is that you can use the paddles in sport mode, without going into sport mode.
• Front-wheel drive standard on the base ES, LS and top XLS, with an innovative 4-wheel-drive system available on the LS or XLS. On 4WD models, the off-road heritage of those rugged Monteros is revisited by a round knob on the console that can select 2-wheel (front) drive, automatically fluctuating 4-wheel drive (front bias, transferring power to rear when called for), or lock it into 4-wheel drive to keep all four wheels churning (rear bias) in deep snow or off-road. Towing capacity is 2,000 pounds with 2-wheel drive, 3,500 with 4-wheel.
• An available third row of split-back seats is specified for kids. Four adults is a perfect fit, but another can sit in the middle of the 60/40 second row to make five. If the rear seats are up, two kids can fit back there, expanding capacity to seven, and the third row folds flat into what is a hidden storage bin in models that don’t select the third-row seats. Cargo room is 14.9 cubic feet behind the third seats, 36.2 with the third row folded down, and 72.6 with both second and third rows down.
• Safety features include front and side airbags, and side-curtain bags for the first two rows; four-wheel disc brakes with ABS and electronic brake distribution standard, as is traction control and active skid control.
Some of those many features would be impressive on an SUV that cost twice as much as the “low-$20,000†price Mitsubishi vowed for the base ES model, which comes pretty well equipped with front-wheel drive.
{IMG2}
Moving up to the LS gains some useful things, such as audio remote switches on the steering wheel, and the availability of 4-wheel drive, but those features shouldnÂ’t boost the price that much, which means the XLS, adding 18-inch alloys over the basic 16s, and the Sportronic remote shift paddles for the steering wheel column, should still come in under the $30,000 mark, which might only be reached by adding everything, including the luxury package, with leather seating.
Driving the Outlander with some, ah, spirit around the twisty highways coming out of the mountains north of San Francisco, heading toward the Pacific Ocean, showed off some impressive handling with the front-drive version, although I pushed it hard enough to get a little dose of drama from the understeer. Later, in the 4WD XLS, it seemed to be impossible to drive beyond the handling capabilities, thanks to the great suspension and the tight body.
The high-tech 3.0 V6 offers more power, more RPMs (the 220 horsepower peak is at 6,250), and fewer emissions, and it also has EPA highway estimates of 27 miles per gallon for FWD, and 26 for the 4WD. The fun of shifting with the paddles also makes the power seem more than the numbers imply by assuring youÂ’re in the right gear range for every circumstance. One other major asset is that the engine requires regular gas, a major saving at every fuel stop compared to premium-burning rivals.
A couple other impressive features include a couple of electronic touches – a hard-drive based navigation system that will house over 6 gigs of information and still have room to store 1,200 songs for replay through the optional Rockford Fosgate audio system. The AM-FM-CD-MP3 system has 650 watts and nine speakers, with a huge 10-inch subwoofer mounted in the rearmost wall, and a digital signal processor to best use the interior as a sound chamber.
If it sounds like the Outlander is loaded from front to rear, look at the extremities. At the front, a PremAir catalytic radiator is coated to turn 80 percent of all ozone molecules that pass by into oxygen molecules. At the rear, the top hinged tailgate flips up, leaving a small lower lip, and that folds down, then folds out, locking itself into an easy-loading shelf, or a prime seat for tailgaters.
Top Car, Truck ‘cats’ move to the front of the herd
The hay is in the barn, as they say, although a more appropriate saying might be: “The Car of the Year is in the garage.†Winners of the 2007 North American International Car (and Truck) of the Year are determined but remain secret until Sunday (January 7), when their disclosure kicks off media dayspreceding the Detroit International Auto Show.
The Car of the Year will come down to the voting points among the Honda Fit, Saturn Aura, and Toyota Camry. Truck of the Year will be the Mazda CX-7, Ford Edge, or Chevrolet Silverado.
Those of us automotive media types on the jury of 49 have voted, and this year for the first time, we voted to determine the top three point-getters, and then voted again on the three to make a more-focused winner. In past years, when the vote went in for finalists, the top three candidates were ranked 1-2-3, and only the agency that counts the ballots knew which of them was the winner. After years of considering the possibility – most persistently pushed by me – the membership agreed overwhelmingly to revote on the final three this year.
It is a good time to make the move, because this is clearly the most competitive year IÂ’ve ever seen in my 13 years of voting on the 14-year-old endeavor, which, unlike various magazine awards, is unaffected by advertising revenue, leading us to boldly proclaim that it is the most valid. As IÂ’ve often noted, you canÂ’t argue with the objectivity, because getting 49 ego-centered automotive media types to agree on anything is a lot like herding cats.
For example, Motor Trend’s annual car of the year award, announced in its current issue, went to the Camry. Two weeks later, Car & Driver magazine’s staff compared six intermediate sedans, voting on numerous criteria – including a couple of subjective segments, which allow a favorite to overtake one with more objective points – and in that competition, the new Camry came in fifth out of six! The Aura came in fourth, with the consensus ranking 1. Honda Accord, 2. Nissan Altima, 3. Kia Optima, 4. Aura, 5. Camry, and 6. Chrysler Sebring.
How can one magazine rank a car the best on the market among every category, while another ranks it fifth out of six in a six-car competition within its own segment? And how could two of our three finalists be ranked 4-5 by a magazine? Simple. Magazine writers apparently herd cats, too.
My personal choices have met with mixed success all through the process. First, I feel strongly that the best of the new vehicles for 2007 should include the Volvo C70 and Volkswagen Eos convertible-hardtops, plus the BMW 335 Coupe, and the Suzuki SX4 bargain all-wheel-drive compact. To me, those are cars of worldwide significance, along with the Honda Fit, Infiniti G35, Altima, Camry, and Aura. Since the C70, Eos, BMW and Suzuki all failed to make the reduction from the original field to the dozen candidates for cars and 14 for trucks.
When we vote to determine three finalists, we have 25 points to be distributed among all those cars we choose, in any order, with a maximum of 10 allowed for one and only one vehicle. My personal split the votes up, ranking the Fit high, then the Infiniti G35 — a fantastic mid-luxury sports sedan with all-wheel drive available — leading a cluster of the Altima, Dodge Caliber, Camry, Mercedes S-Class, and the Aura.
{IMG2}
My truck vote was similarly spread, and I found it even more difficult to give points to all the vehicles I thought were worthy. So dispersed were my points that I couldnÂ’t give anything 10 points. Because crossover SUVs are the hot-issue in automotives, I picked the Acura MDX a point ahead of a deadlock between the Mazda CX-7 and Acura RDX, then the BMW X5, Audi Q7, Toyota FJ Cruiser, Ford Edge and GMC Acadia. The Silverado remake is the best that truck has ever been, and while it captures numerous features from other trucks, and may be the only true truck in the field, it doesnÂ’t really break new technological ground like the vehicles I voted ahead of it.
Now for the revote. Here is a brief overview of the finalists, in order of my opinion.
Car of the Year:
Honda Fit — Fuel prices and traffic congestion have a new adversary in the Fit, which defines – and sets standards for – a new era of small cars. The expected over-30 fuel economy and creative interior layout are complemented by fun-to-drive performance and cat-quick agility, which prove boredom is not required to soothe a social conscience. A 1.5-liter high-tech four jumps at the touch of the steering wheel automatic paddle shifters, and foldable seats allow everything up to bicycles to fit inside. ThereÂ’s that word again.
Saturn Aura — The “I-canÂ’t-believe-itÂ’s-a-Saturn†Aura mixes an appealing design and luxurious interior with enough potency from the optional high-tech 3.6-liter V6 to create a new flair for Saturn in particular, and for General Motors inÂ…ahÂ…general. Big wheels help stability, a big trunk and roomy rear seat enhance livability, and the engine upgrade makes it an impressive variation of a vehicle first built by GMÂ’s European Opel subsidiary.
Toyota Camry — Revising a champion is challenging, but Toyota improved every facet of the Camry with a stylish 2007 redesign that offers models that stress luxury, economy, or – dare we say? – sportiness to the nationÂ’s largest seller. The base model is good, the sporty and luxury models are more than good, and the hybrid is impressive, although I got only 30 miles per gallon with one, driving conservatively with an eye on the fuel gauge.
Truck of the Year:
Mazda CX-7 — Crossover SUVs are the rage, and MazdaÂ’s seductively sporty CX-7 has the zoom-zoom of a sports car with SUV attributes. Few competitors can match the zip of a six-speed turbo four, winter-beating assets of all-wheel drive, and the CX-7Â’s bargain price. It lacks the sporty paddle shifters, but in the mid-$20,000 range, a direct-injection and turbocharged 2.3 pumps out 244horsepower and leaves large engines in its dust.
Ford Edge — The name Edge also describes the sharply-chiseled styling of FordÂ’s well-equipped entry in the crossover race. Comfortable interior appointments and well-planted SUV solidity may require extra heftiness, but it is adequately offset by the punch of a new 3.5 V6. Built on a lengthened and stiffened Mazda platform, and borrowing from VolvoÂ’s safety and traction technology, the Edge stays personal and leaves third-row seating to its larger siblings.
Chevrolet Silverado — While overdue for a renovation, the new Silverado got it right for Â’07, with vastly improved looks and chassis stiffness, outstanding interior design, plus the wise inclusion of some of the most-clever features from various competitors. Styling is definitely first-rate, but claims of 20 miles per gallon are strictly EPA-estimate fantasy, based on the 13.8 I got in a week of freeway driving.
So, what will win? ItÂ’s anybodyÂ’s guess. I have a hunch, though, that if the car result isnÂ’t the closest on record, the truck winner will be. The envelope, pleaseÂ…
A little icing alters luxury-performance car selection
Holiday time is always special, snow or no-snow, with family gatherings for Christmas that always seem to overlap to also cover New Year’s celebrations. This year became special on the road as well, because by chance, I had the opportunity to simultaneously road test three of the best mid-luxury sports sedans – the Infiniti M45 Sport, the Acura TL Type-S, and the Audi S6.
If you like winter, this Christmas season was pretty wimpy, especially in Minnesota. While the southern half of the state got a couple storms, the Duluth and North Shore area has been remarkably free of snow. It was, in fact, one of only four times in history that the Duluth area had a “Brown Christmas.Ââ€
Meanwhile, if you like luxury cars, but also want your car to rise above standard-issue models in quick and agile performance and handling, youÂ’d choose a car that lacked the ultra-soft or ultra-quiet features of pure luxury. In that mindset, if you had a choice of vehicles to drive across the country, but for combined comfort and excitement, the M45 Sport, Acura TL Type-S, and Audi S6 would be a perfect hat trick.
Two things made this exercise particularly worthwhile. First, the Infiniti M45 Sport, with a 4.5-liter V8 (325 horsepower and 336 foot-pounds of torque), is front- engine/rear-drive; the Acura TL Type-S, with a 3.5-liter V6 (258 horses and 286 foot-pounds), is front-engine/front-drive; and the Audi S6 with a 5.2-liter V10 (435 horsepower, 398 foot-pounds) is quattro-loaded with front-engine/all-wheel drive.
All three cars had high-performance automatic transmissions with paddle-control manual shifters on the steering wheel. All of them had the most sophisticated new traction-control and stability-control technical stuff.
So-called “performance†magazines universally prefer rear-drive, and it’s fun to apply power until you hang the rear end loose for an exhilarating way to take a tight turn on a race track. Conservative types in the worst winter climates prefer the security of all-wheel drive, although Audi’s quattro system was aimed at all-out performance handling, with the outer two wheels getting more power for cornering,, and handles foul weather as a side effect.
In the Upper Midwest, front-wheel drive not only was accepted but was embraced by all who ever white-knuckled a rear-drive car in a winter storm, and front-wheel-drive remains the preference, because they have most of the traction assets of all-wheel drive without the added weight or expense.
Now we return to Christmas weekend. For the journey 150 miles north from the Minneapolis-Saint Paul area to Duluth, the three vehicles were apportioned. I drove north first, in the Audi A6. My wife, Joan, came later that afternoon, in the M45 Sport, and our two sons would come the next day.
It was only drizzly with a chilly rain when I left, but I saw a few snow flurries on the trip, so when I heard that the rain had turned to snow in the Twin Cities, I called Joan. She had started, but said the driving was treacherous enough that she had slowed to 40-45.
“Oops,†she said, “the car next to me just went off the road.Ââ€
Because the storm had caught us by surprise, I hadnÂ’t worried about the M45 Sport being rear drive. The snow grew in severity and blew across the whole central part of the state, and Joan arrived late, but intact. Barely.
She then relayed the story about how, two-thirds of the way through the trip, she was driving 40 in the right lane, with no traffic around her, and only one car reasonably close behind. Suddenly, without any input from Joan, the M45 SportÂ’s rear end started to swing out to the side.
She knew she was on glazed ice, and she didnÂ’t panic. She said she tried to remember some of the things we had discussed after various emergency-driving courses IÂ’d been through.
One of them was to turn the steering wheel into the skid, but don’t make the common mistake of turning it all the way to lock – and, more important, once the car reaches the “point of no return†and is destined to spin out, bring the steering wheel back to straight ahead and take your foot off the brake and the gas.
Sounds strange, but if you keep the wheel turned, the skid will be encouraged to make the car go around and maybe around again. Bringing it back to neutral, and getting off the pedals, will cause the car to seek the path of least resistance in the skid – which is straight ahead, where the tires want to roll.
Well, she admitted she forgot the first part, but held her cool. The rear end of the M45 Sport swung briefly to the inside, then went to the outside — all the way around, a full 360-degrees. To her amazement and eternal relief, it finished the full spin and continued straight ahead, straddling the center line, but with no contact, no ditch expedition, no problem.
The engine had died from the skid, and before she could restart, the car behind her slowed and asked if she was OK. She gave them a wave and said she was fine. I wondered what went through the minds of the people in that car, when they watched, in some degree of horror, as this shiny new Infiniti up ahead gently and smoothly spun an entire 360-degree spin and all was OK.
Our whole family was relieved that Joan had come through her sudden emergency without a problem. We also had reinforced the belief in the inherent advantages of front-wheel drive, or all-wheel drive.
{IMG2}
Performance magazine writers ridicule front-wheel-drive cars for lacking the all-out performance feel of rear-drive, and whine about front-wheel-drive vehicles having a little torque-steer when driven beyond reasonable limits in tight corners. I would love to see one of those hot-shot drivers transplanted into the driverÂ’s seat of that M45 Sport at the moment Mother Nature decided to prove who is really in charge.
The M45 Sport is an exceptional car. Its high-tech V8 has variable valve timing, and the 5-speed automatic has a feature that matches revs whenever it is called upon to downshift. It also has a unique rear suspension that flexes enough to act as four-wheel steering. And, it has EBD, BA, VDC and TCS – which translate into electronic brake-force distribution, brake assist, vehicle dynamic control, and traction control system. These are the sophisticated devices that cause rear-drive zealots to insist we could all get through winter with rear drive.
They overlook the obvious, which is that the same devices on front-wheel-drive cars enhance their ice-driving superiority. The whole point is merely one of physics. If the rear wheels push the car, then on slippery surfaces, the front wheels are coasting, while the rears spin with power and might want to try to pass the fronts – which, in a nutshell, is the definition of a spinout.
There are ways to make the best of a threatening situation, by installing winter or all-season tires. My preference remains Nokian WR all-seasons. But, again, such tires can help a rear-drive car survive winter, but they also can be mounted on front-wheel-drive or rear-wheel-drive, where their traction attributes can make winter driving enjoyable, rather than threatening.
Ironically, there wasnÂ’t a flake of snow in Duluth from that storm. So we didnÂ’t get a chance to test the comparative assets of the Audi S6, which is the high-performance upgrade version of the A6, or the Acura TL S-Type, which is the high-performance upgrade of the TL.
If we had encountered the same glazed freeway stretch, however, we would have slowed down and continued in a straightforward vector. It might have taken just as long to get there, but it would have been minus the heart-in-the-throat moment of terror during a 360-degree spin.
You donÂ’t have to take my word for it. Ask Joan.
Acura’s 2007 MDX sets luxury-performance standards
The 2007 Acura MDX seemed like it would be little more than a stylish upgrade of an already very good SUV. It is much more than that, which might not have been readily discernable except for a late-summer downpour that struck a Pennsylvania road-racing track just as we were about to test-drive several SUVs, and challenging the elements proved the new MDX might be the most capable performer among all SUVs.
More recently, I further test-drove an MDX for a week in Minnesota, and could better appreciate its comfortable seats, technical potency, and superb ergonomics. The MDX may deserve at least a B+ and maybe an A, just for the comfortable appointments and interior features, but recalling its response while being hurled around that rain-drenched race track boosted its marks to A+ all the way.
The MDX is a strong candidate for North American Truck of the Year, although competition is fierce, with AcuraÂ’s more compact and sporty RD-X, plus the Mazda CX-7, GMC Acadia, Ford Edge, Toyota FJ Cruiser, Dodge Nitro, Audi Q7, Hyundai Santa Fe, Suzuki XL-7, Jeep Wrangler, Saturn Vue Greenline, Chevy Silverado and Tahoe, and the all-new BMW X5.
The current 2006 X5 was good enough to be Acura’s overall benchmark, and if someone had quizzed me about which of the dozens of luxury, full-size, or crossover SUVs would be the best high-performer, I probably would have picked either the BMW X5 or the Porsche Cayenne. But that was before I was among the automotive journalists at the 2007 MDX introduction, where we drove it against some targeted rivals at BeaverRun road-racing track.
We got acquainted with the MDXÂ’s features by driving a herd of them through the rolling-hill countryside to the track. After lunch and race-track-oriented technical talk, I was looking forward to driving the enlarged MDX on a road-course, through challenges it will never face in real-life.
Acura officials tuned the new MDX suspension at GermanyÂ’s Nurburgring, the most torturous road-racing track in the world, but I was impressed to see a BMW X5, a Porsche Cayenne, and a Volvo XC90 V8, all parked alongside a string of MDXes in pit lane. They could have picked less-challenging but equally prominent competitors. The plan was for us was to drive one at a time around the track, as hard as we dared, alternating between an MDX, then a competitor, then another MDX, and so on, until we had driven everything.
Trouble was, the sky opened up just as we were getting started, and a front being pushed up from the south by a late-summer hurricane was heavy enough to send most of the media types under a tent for cover, then scurrying inside for shelter. My thought was that we were test-driving a new, all-wheel-drive SUV on a road-racing course, so what could be more ideal than to do it in foul weather? A couple other journalists shared my willingness to get a little drenched while hopping back and forth among the vehicles, and the rest must have thought we were out of our minds.
The X5, the Cayenne, and the XC90 all did pretty well in those circumstances. All of them were fine on the straights, and, if you used a little care, you could go fairly hard through the turns. The X5 felt the most rigidly firm, although I didn’t get a feeling that it would warn me if I was overdoing it. The Cayenne was more flexible through the corners, but the V6 didnÂ’t have enough oomph to power out of them. The Volvo XC90 had V8 power, and while it leaned the most in the curves, it felt secure and stable, if not as performance-oriented.
The surprise was that with the MDX, I felt far more comfortable going much harder into the corners than in any of the competitors, to the point that my confidence level led to something approaching reckless abandon. The MDX has an all-new 3.7-liter V6 – the largest and most powerful engine every put in any Honda production vehicle – and it also has a new SH-AWD system, which brought along an assurance that whatever I did, the vehicle would respond with precise steering and suspension to handle it. I got aggressive enough to try to “dirt-track†it in some curves – cocking the steering wheel sharply enough just before the apex of a turn to coax a slight, high-speed weight shift to the outside, then hammering the gas and blasting, or splashing, through the turns, right on line.
SH-AWD is for “super handling†all-wheel drive, modified from the system introduced on the luxury RL sedan a couple of years back. In most systems, the drive wheels – front, in the MDX – get maximum power until the computer detects a tendency to spin, at which time it apportions some power to the other axle. With SH-AWD, torque also can be transferred by accelerating hard, where the weight shift sends power rearward. In normal cruising, a maximum of 90 percent torque to the front of the MDX has; while accelerating, the ratio goes to 50-50; and whenever full weight shift goes to the rear, as in climbing a steep hill, anything up to a maximum 70 percent of torque goes to the rear axle. The secret to SH-AWD is that if you swerve abruptly, as if to dodge a deer that darts out in your path, or go hard around a sharp curve, up to100 percent of whatever power is directed to the rear gets shifted to the outside rear wheel.
All of this technical weight-transferring is seamless, and all the driver feels is that the right-rear drive wheel which is most likely to lose traction under those circumstances instead gets the largest dose of stability-controlled power to push the MDX around the curve in a perfect trajectory. In real-world driving, Large, 13-inch front and 13.2-inch rear disc brakes have four-channel antilock, and Acura tests show the MDX beats the Cayenne, X5 and XC90 in braking tests, and that the stability system plus SH-AWD makes the MDX the best in class in snow tests. Redesigned front strut and rear multilink suspension, combined with the Delphi active-damper system, and 18-inch alloy wheels, help the SH-AWD to exceptional handling.
A normal owner may never approach the limits we sought in that rain, on that race course, but it’s a secure feeling to know it can handle any such maneuver. Acura claims it exceeded its benchmark aimed of the BMW X5 for performance, with active roll control, and Delphi electromagnetic dampers that use 15 sensors to react instantly to stiffen as required in a revision from the shock absorbers Delphi designed for the new Corvette and Cadillac XLR roadster. With a console switch to set either sport or comfort settings, Acura also claims the MDX exceeds its other benchmarks – the Cayenne for handling, and the RX350 in ride comfort.
Chassis engineer Frank Paluch calls the targeted spread family moms and driver dads, based on the previous MDX owners. “Moms would drive the MDX all week, while dads drove the other family car to work, then drove the MDX on weekends,†said Paluch. “Our intention was to keep the moms satisfied, and add enough driving excitement and other missing attributes to attract the dads as well.Ââ€
The high-nose look was designed to resemble a racing yacht, and technical upgrades give a performance feel to the driver, without compromising the comfort for all occupants, in a package worthy of taking a client to lunch, or three friends golfing, of for a family with two or more kids who can sit three across in the second row of seats, or, if theyÂ’re young enough to be spry, flip up the two occasional seats in the third row.
If performance was the key new ingredient, Acura found it with the 3.7-liter V6. By increasing bore and stroke from the 3.5, enlarging the valve diameter, and using special silicon-aluminum sleeves in the cylinders, engineers also installed oil-jet piston cooling. The 2006 model’s 3.5 engine felt potent at 253 horsepower, but the new 3.7 has 300 horsepower – gaining its aggregate 47 horsepower by getting 20 from increased displacement and compression ratio,15 from the new intake ports and the VTEC cam-timing, and 12 from the revised induction and exhaust system. Torque also increases by 25, to 275 foot-pounds.
The 5-speed automatic transmission is smoothly efficient, and adds more than just sports-car fun with a manual shift gate, and little tabs behind the steering wheel to let the driver upshift with the right hand or downshift with the left, without looking away or taking either hand off the wheel. The MDX goes beyond being sporty to drive with a 5,000-pound towing capacity, which could be a boat, or a 24-foot camper trailer. An electronic trailer stability assist helps sense and eliminate any tail-wagging the vehicle-trailer might be tempted to develop from a lane-change or emergency swerve.
With a lowered stance, the MDX is 2.2 inches longer, 2.4 inches wider and about a half-inch taller than its predecessor. It seems inconceivable that anyone would use the MDX for serious off-roading, but its 26-degree approach angle, 24-degree departure angle, and 20.2-degree breakover angle mean it would be willing to handle the assignment.
Safety, a major focus at Honda/Acura these days, is built into the all-new structural platform of the MDX. Over 60 percent high-strength steel is used in construction, compared to 13 percent in the current model. The 360-degree safety strategy encased in all the assorted front and side airbags includes rollover protection. In a frontal impact, the structure sends some of the force up the front pillars and the rest down to the frame perimeter, rather than penetrating the safety cage. A quad ring that encircles the rear hatch opening further stiffens the structure.
{IMG2}
The interior ergonomics are excellent, and some subtle but effective touches include high-resolution instrument lighting that adjusts automatically to ambient light conditions; an intuitive navigation system, which has been ranked as the best in the industry (although I still like the Nissan/Infiniti unit best) uses an 8-inch screen on the dash, which doubles for rear-view-camera video display; real-time traffic information about congestion in 31 major U.S. cities; rear-seat 9-inch DVD screen with wireless headphones; hands-free voice recognition controls; plus a choice of exceptional audio systems, both with XM satellite ratio. The stock MDX audio is 253 watts with eight speakers and a 6-CD changer with an auxiliary iPod jack. The upgrade is to the superb Panasonic ELS DVD 5.1 surround system, with10 speakers, and 410 watts – a unit that I declared the best in the industry when it was introduced as standard equipment in the Acura TL.
For over-the-top features, there is a GPS-based, solar-sensing, tri-zone climate control system. And, for safety and convenience, you can transfer up to 1,000 cell-phone contact names, each with up to 10 numbers, to the MDX hands-free system, so you can then access any of them for voice-command calling.
Acura aims at selling 60,000 units in the first year of the new MDX, at prices that range from $41,000 to $48,000. Buyers can add sport, technology or entertainment packages, or buy items from those packages as free-standing options. As it is, the MDXÂ’s impressive technology and features make its prices seem reasonable. And thatÂ’s without knowing about how fantastic it is while frolicking around a road-racing course in what would normally be considered treacherous conditions.
Volkswagen Eos brings new dawn to all seasons
The race for 2007 North American International Car of the Year is wide open – wider open, in fact, than any year I can recall. As one of the jury members who will vote on the winner, let’s check out the Volkswagen Eos as evidence of how stiff the competition is.
I’ve had the opportunity to extensively drive the Eos at the media introduction in Portland, Ore., where we drove east down the Columbia River Gorge and on out to the majestic Mount Hood, and then even more extensively when I got a press-fleet model for a week of driving from the Minneapolis-St.Paul area up through Northern Minnesota.
In Greek mythology, Eos is the goddess of dawn, defined as the one who “rises up from the depths of the ocean each morning in her chariot to bring daylight to mankind.” In less romantic and more pragmatic United States culture, we use the comparatively grim technique of daylight savings time, and delude ourselves into thinking that giving us more light when morning is normally still dark is such a good thing that we don’t mind condemning ourselves to darkness when we should all be enjoying afternoon daylight.
Ah, progress.
At Volkswagen, the Eos has a novel approach to letting the light shine in, no matter what time dawn arrives in your driveway. The car is fashioned out of what appears to be a combination of the Golf – oops! – make that Rabbit, and the 4-door sedan Jetta, converted to a 2-door coupe with a trunk. At the touch of a button, a panel above the trunk lid swings open like the jaws of some other type of deep sea creature, and it promptly swallows the 45-piece roof, which folds itself up for deposit. Just like that, a stylish coupe becomes a stunning convertible.
This trick is not unprecedented, of course. You can find a Mercedes sports car that pulls it off for about $90,000, and you can find the new Volvo C70, which makes a stunning transformation from pillarless 4-seat coupe to convertible. More recently, the Mazda Miata has acquired a hardtop that also disappears, and the Pontiac G6 also has a model that will hide its roof.
The Volvo C70 is one of my favorite vehicles available on the market, even though it costs something on the north side of $40,000, because Volvo has managed to incorporate its legendary safety tricks within those seductive lines.
But the Eos has a few features unique to itself, and accomplishes the same trick as the C70 for about $10,000 less. In fact, the Eos starts at $27,990, so you can get quite a bargain in a tightly built, highly refined coupe/convertible. It’s also quite likely you will be tempted to dip into the option bin and run the price up to the $36,110 that my week-long test-drive displayed.
Anyhow, here’s where the 2007 Car of the Year deal comes in. There are some quite-likely favorites in the field, such as the midsize Toyota Camry, Nissan Altima, Saturn Aura, Chrysler Sebring, and Infiniti G35, plus refined/economy entries such as the Honda Fit, Dodge Caliber, Nissan Yaris, or Hyundai Elantra, or costlier luxury models such as the Mercury S-Class, Lexus LS460, or Jaguar XK.
Where, I hear you ask, are the Volvo C70 and the Volkwagen Eos? Where they are, it turns out, is on the outside looking in. That’s correct, while I would rank the Eos and the C70 right at the top of the list – as well as the new BMW 3-Series Coupe on the higher end, and the Suzuki SX4 on the less-costly end. But I’m only one of 50 voters, and the majority rules. The majority also is capable of making a few mistakes. The dozen finalists all have their merits as they currently fight for our vote a month from now. But it would be conceivable that some voters could rank the C70, Eos, BMW 335i, and Suzuki SX4 among their top four. So I was astonished, and disappointed, to find that our preliminary vote to cut to a workable dozen left all of them out.
Convertibles have made a strong comeback in the last few years, and they seem to be even more appreciated in colder climates, where every available day of moderate warmth finds the top down, compared to southern areas where folks tend to seek protection from the sun. In Great White North areas of the Upper Midwest, or New England or the Pacific Northwest, or Rocky Mountain areas, for that matter, what could be better than a stylish, front-wheel-drive, 4-seat convertible that can fit itself with a solid, weather-proof steel roof to take on the worst blizzards and most frigid temperatures of winter?
Maybe the C70 has a slight edge in sleek looks – for those who still haven’t adopted the new and glittery large-mouth grille that is VW’s new signature design – and all-out safety, but the Eos has some major advantages of its own, beyond the lower initial cost. The roof itself, is one thing. And the basic engine is another.
The Eos roof is not all-steel, because the front half of it is plexiglass, so you can unsheathe it to see the sky even when it is closed. At the touch of a button, the glass vents upward at the rear, and another touch slides it open to a massive, full-width sunroof that is indeed a new twist on a retractable roof. Push the button yet again, and the heavy-gauge side tracks unhitch from the top corners of the windshield, two steel sections sandwich the glass, and the whole apparatus folds itself away in 25 mesmerizing seconds.
A trunk panel must be in place for the top to retract. The trunk is spacious, with 10.5 cubic feet, and locking the hard panel in its slots merely cuts off the top of the trunk space, reducing it to a still-generous 6.6 cubic feet. It also is a neat barrier to prevent any outside stuff to come in contact with whatever you’ve stowed in the trunk.
The test car came with the “base” engine/transmission, which is Audi’s superb 2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine, a direct-injection, double-overhead-camshaft gem that is also turbocharged to deliver 200 horsepower and 207 foot-pounds of torque. The shifter was a 6-speed stick, and it put the engine through its considerable paces very nicely. The beauty of that engine, which can also be found in the Audi A4 and A3, and in VW’s GLI model of the Jetta and GTI model of the Golf/Rabbit, is that its electronic engine-management system thrusts it to its torque peak at a mere 1,800 RPMs and holds it at a plateau to 5,000 RPMs, while its horsepower curve also has an expanded peak from 5,100-6,000 RPMs.
Those numbers mean that when you tap your toe on the gas, the drive-by-wire throttle gives you a blast-off level of full torque at barely above idle speed, and holds it right up until you reach the high-rev horsepower peak.
Also available is the 6-speed automatic that I drove alternately with the stick at the Eos introduction. As I’ve written before, that particular direct-sequential unit is the first automatic transmission that I found to be more fun and even preferable to the manual. It upshifts and downshifts instantaneously, with a neat little turbo-blip of its own between shifts.
Another option is an upgrade to a 3.2-liter V6 with 250 horsepower and 235 foot-pounds of torque, and the same 6-speed automatic that is optional on the 4 is standard with the V6. That engine pushes the base price of the Eos to $36,850, which would be fairly reasonable, if you needed the bigger engine. Personally, I think the 2.0-liter 4 is one of the best engines in the industry, right there with the high output 4s from Honda, and now Mazda, so I would choose the 2.0.
{IMG2}
My week with the Eos proved my theory, because while always being quick to accelerate, I conductged my own real-world tests to compare against its EPA estimates of 23 city/32 highway. I am a staunch skeptic of EPA mileage estimates, although while running the car fairly aggressively in city driving and then from the Twin Cities to Duluth, using liberally high-RPM shift points, I got combined fuel economy of 29 miles per gallon.
On the freeway, returning from Duluth to Minneapolis amid the usual late-Sunday afternoon congestion on I-35, I set the cruise control to run with the traffic flow, which was an SUV-dominated 78 miles per hour (what gasoline shortage?). The computer indicated 30.5 miles per gallon. Then I dropped down to 75 mph, reset the cruise and the computer, and the reading improved to 33 mpg. Although traffic flow made me feel like a roadblock, I set the cruise and computer again, exactly at 70 mph, and over a 25-mile stretch the computer indicated the Eos was attaining 35 mpg.
Aside from staunch performance – either power or economy, and usually both – the Eos is loaded with creature features. The rear window glass is heated, for example. The bucket seats are eight-way adjustable manually, or with an optional 12-way power control. Climate control has a pollen filter and dual-controls are available. A 600-watt audio system specifically designed by Denmark’s Dynaudio is an option over the standard 8-speaker unit. A DVD navigation system is also available, and was a feature on my test car. The test vehicle had the Sport Package, which includes leather sport seats, leather wrapped steering wheel with multiple remote switches, brushed aluminum interior trim, rain-sensing wipers, satellite radio, all-season tires on 17-inch alloy wheels, and a 6-CD changer.
Full airbag protection, including a side bag-and-curtain system, comes standard on all Eos models, as are 4-wheel antilock brakes, electronic stabilization, and antislip regulation. Fully independent rear suspension works with stabilizer bars front and rear and self-leveling shock absorbers.
While the Eos provides all the fun and wind-in-your-hair enjoyment that makes any convertible special, it also is built so substantially that it is free of vibration and shakiness, even with the top down, and is quite silent with the top up. And if you live in the Great White North, where you aren’t going to be tempted to drop the top from November until April, you’ll just have to pretend you’ve parked the convertible away for the winter, while you enjoy having a very solid coupe that is quick, agile, and capable of 30-plus miles per gallon.
If it all makes the Eos sound like a very strong car-of-the-year candidate, I can only agree.
About the Author
John Gilbert is a lifetime Minnesotan and career journalist, specializing in cars and sports during and since spending 30 years at the Minneapolis Tribune, now the Star Tribune. More recently, he has continued translating the high-tech world of autos and sharing his passionate insights as a freelance writer/photographer/broadcaster. A member of the prestigious North American Car and Truck of the Year jury since 1993. John can be heard Monday-Friday from 9-11am on 610 KDAL(www.kdal610.com) on the "John Gilbert Show," and writes a column in the Duluth Reader.
For those who want to keep up with John Gilbert's view of sports, mainly hockey with a Minnesota slant, click on the following:
Click here for sports